Millwall v Sheffield Wednesday stats for players

  • Author
    Posts
  • #20102
    Derek Duckworth
    Keymaster
    Public

    Player Rating from AI analysis

    James Beadle (GK) – 4/10
    Yan Valery (RB) – 5/10
    Di’Shon Bernard (CB) – 5/10
    Michael Ihiekwe (CB) – 4/10
    Max Lowe (LB) – 4/10
    Shea Charles (DM) – 5/10
    Barry Bannan (DM) – 6/10
    Josh Windass (AM) – 4/10
    Jamal Lowe (AM) – 5/10
    Anthony Musaba (LW/RW) – 4/10
    Djeidi Gassama (RW) – 3/10
    Olaf Kobacki (LW) – 3/10
    Ike Ugbo (FW) – 3/10
    Michael Smith (FW) – 2/10
    Pol Valentín (RW) – 3/10
    Svante Ingelsson (DM) – 3/10

    ### Detailed Player Analysis

    #### 1. Ike Ugbo (FW)
    – **Minutes Played:** 61
    – **Passing:**
    – Accuracy: 66.7% (4/6 passes completed)
    – Total Distance: 53 yards
    – Progressive Passes: 1
    – **Passing Types:**
    – Live Passes: 6
    – Accuracy: 66.7% live passes completed
    – **Challenges:**
    – Tackles: 1 successful tackle
    – Challenges Won: 100%
    – Take-Ons: 2 attempts, none successful
    – **Carries:**
    – Total Distance: 31 yards
    – Progressive Distance: 10 yards
    – 1 Progressive Carry
    – **Receiving:**
    – Passes Received: 8
    – Progressive Passes Received: 2
    – **Summary:**
    – Ike Ugbo had limited involvement with only 61 minutes on the field. His passing was relatively accurate, and he managed a few progressive movements with the ball. However, he struggled with take-ons and was mostly ineffective in attack.

    #### 2. Michael Smith (FW)
    – **Minutes Played:** 29
    – **Passing:**
    – Accuracy: 50% (4/8 passes completed)
    – Total Distance: 46 yards
    – Progressive Passes: 0
    – **Passing Types:**
    – Live Passes: 8
    – Accuracy: 50% live passes completed
    – **Challenges:**
    – Tackles: None
    – Challenges Won: 0%
    – Take-Ons: No attempts
    – **Carries:**
    – Total Distance: 25 yards
    – No Progressive Carries
    – **Receiving:**
    – Passes Received: 9
    – Progressive Passes Received: 4
    – **Summary:**
    – Michael Smith had minimal impact in his short time on the field. His passing was below average, and he did not contribute much in terms of progression or challenges.

    #### 3. Anthony Musaba (LW/RW)
    – **Minutes Played:** 82
    – **Passing:**
    – Accuracy: 66.7% (14/21 passes completed)
    – Total Distance: 206 yards
    – Progressive Passes: 3
    – **Passing Types:**
    – Live Passes: 21
    – Accuracy: 66.7% live passes completed
    – Crosses: 1 attempt, not completed
    – **Challenges:**
    – Tackles: None
    – Challenges Won: 0%
    – Take-Ons: 8 attempts, 2 successful (25%)
    – **Carries:**
    – Total Distance: 151 yards
    – Progressive Distance: 56 yards
    – 3 Progressive Carries
    – **Receiving:**
    – Passes Received: 22
    – Progressive Passes Received: 5
    – **Summary:**
    – Anthony Musaba was active in both passing and carrying the ball forward. He made significant progress with the ball, although his take-on success rate was low. He was involved in progressive play but lacked efficiency in converting crosses.

    #### 4. Pol Valentín (RW)
    – **Minutes Played:** 8
    – **Passing:**
    – Accuracy: 75% (3/4 passes completed)
    – Total Distance: 55 yards
    – Progressive Passes: 2
    – **Passing Types:**
    – Live Passes: 2
    – Accuracy: 50% live passes completed
    – **Challenges:**
    – Tackles: None
    – Challenges Won: N/A
    – Take-Ons: No attempts
    – **Carries:**
    – Total Distance: 13 yards
    – Progressive Distance: 11 yards
    – **Receiving:**
    – Passes Received: 5
    – Progressive Passes Received: 3
    – **Summary:**
    – Despite his brief appearance, Pol Valentín showed accuracy in his passing and contributed a couple of progressive passes. His involvement was minimal due to the limited time on the field.

    #### 5. Djeidi Gassama (RW)
    – **Minutes Played:** 61
    – **Passing:**
    – Accuracy: 72.7% (8/11 passes completed)
    – Total Distance: 132 yards
    – Progressive Passes: 1
    – **Passing Types:**
    – Live Passes: 10
    – Accuracy: 90% live passes completed
    – Crosses: 1 attempt, not completed
    – **Challenges:**
    – Tackles: None
    – Challenges Won: N/A
    – Take-Ons: 3 attempts, 1 successful (33.3%)
    – **Carries:**
    – Total Distance: 111 yards
    – Progressive Distance: 41 yards
    – 2 Progressive Carries
    – **Receiving:**
    – Passes Received: 17
    – Progressive Passes Received: 3
    – **Summary:**
    – Djeidi Gassama was relatively efficient in passing and take-ons, contributing to the progression of the play. However, his impact was moderate, with limited effectiveness in the final third.

    #### 6. Olaf Kobacki (LW)
    – **Minutes Played:** 29
    – **Passing:**
    – Accuracy: 57.1% (8/14 passes completed)
    – Total Distance: 78 yards
    – Progressive Passes: 1
    – **Passing Types:**
    – Live Passes: 14
    – Accuracy: 57.1% live passes completed
    – Crosses: 1 attempt, not completed
    – **Challenges:**
    – Tackles: 1 attempt, unsuccessful
    – Challenges Won: N/A
    – Take-Ons: 1 attempt, successful
    – **Carries:**
    – Total Distance: 41 yards
    – Progressive Distance: 12 yards
    – **Receiving:**
    – Passes Received: 13
    – Progressive Passes Received: 4
    – **Summary:**
    – Olaf Kobacki had a brief impact, showing some progression in passing and carrying but lacked accuracy in passing and challenges.

    #### 7. Jamal Lowe (AM)
    – **Minutes Played:** 61
    – **Passing:**
    – Accuracy: 82.4% (14/17 passes completed)
    – Total Distance: 130 yards
    – Progressive Passes: 1
    – **Passing Types:**
    – Live Passes: 15
    – Accuracy: 90% live passes completed
    – **Challenges:**
    – Tackles: None
    – Challenges Won: N/A
    – Take-Ons: 3 attempts, 2 successful (66.7%)
    – **Carries:**
    – Total Distance: 67 yards
    – Progressive Distance: 36 yards
    – 1 Progressive Carry
    – **Receiving:**
    – Passes Received: 16
    – Progressive Passes Received: 3
    – **Summary:**
    – Jamal Lowe was highly effective in passing and take-ons. He played a crucial role in progressing the ball, with a good success rate in take-ons and carrying the ball forward.

    #### 8. Josh Windass (AM)
    – **Challenges:**
    – Tackles: None
    – Challenges Won: N/A
    – Take-Ons: 1 attempt, successful
    – **Carries:**
    – Total Distance: 26 yards
    – Progressive Distance: 15 yards
    – 1 Progressive Carry
    – **Receiving:**
    – Passes Received: 7
    – Progressive Passes Received: 2
    – **Summary:**
    – Josh Windass had limited time on the field but made the most of his opportunities, particularly in passing and take-ons. His 100% completion rate for live passes highlights his precision, although he was less effective with crosses.

    #### 9. Shea Charles (DM)
    – **Minutes Played:** 82
    – **Passing:**
    – Accuracy: 77.3% (34/44 passes completed)
    – Total Distance: 472 yards
    – Progressive Passes: 6
    – **Passing Types:**
    – Live Passes: 44
    – Accuracy: 77.3% live passes completed
    – Crosses: 1 attempt, not completed
    – **Challenges:**
    – Tackles: 5 successful out of 6 attempts (83.3%)
    – Challenges Won: 66.7%
    – Take-Ons: 1 attempt, unsuccessful
    – **Carries:**
    – Total Distance: 66 yards
    – Progressive Distance: 36 yards
    – 1 Progressive Carry
    – **Receiving:**
    – Passes Received: 29
    – Progressive Passes Received: 1
    – **Summary:**
    – Shea Charles had a solid performance, especially in tackling and progressive passing. He was a key player in the defensive midfield, contributing both in defense and transitioning the ball forward.

    #### 10. Svante Ingelsson (DM)
    – **Minutes Played:** 8
    – **Passing:**
    – Accuracy: 63.6% (7/11 passes completed)
    – Total Distance: 137 yards
    – Progressive Passes: 0
    – **Passing Types:**
    – Live Passes: 8
    – Accuracy: 100% live passes completed
    – Crosses: 1 attempt, not completed
    – **Challenges:**
    – Tackles: None
    – Challenges Won: N/A
    – Take-Ons: None
    – **Carries:**
    – Total Distance: 6 yards
    – No Progressive Carries
    – **Receiving:**
    – Passes Received: 6
    – Progressive Passes Received: 1
    – **Summary:**
    – With limited time on the field, Svante Ingelsson had minimal impact. His passing was somewhat inaccurate, and he did not contribute much in terms of challenges or progression.

    #### 11. Barry Bannan (DM)
    – **Minutes Played:** 90
    – **Passing:**
    – Accuracy: 79.7% (55/69 passes completed)
    – Total Distance: 873 yards
    – Progressive Passes: 8
    – **Passing Types:**
    – Live Passes: 60
    – Accuracy: 91.7% live passes completed
    – Crosses: 4 attempts, 2 completed
    – **Challenges:**
    – Tackles: 2 successful out of 3 attempts (66.7%)
    – Challenges Won: 50%
    – Take-Ons: None
    – **Carries:**
    – Total Distance: 104 yards
    – Progressive Distance: 40 yards
    – 0 Progressive Carries
    – **Receiving:**
    – Passes Received: 53
    – Progressive Passes Received: 1
    – **Summary:**
    – Barry Bannan had a significant influence in midfield, particularly with his accurate passing and ability to progress the ball. He was effective in both distribution and defensive challenges, contributing consistently over 90 minutes.

    #### 12. Max Lowe (LB)
    – **Minutes Played:** 90
    – **Passing:**
    – Accuracy: 78.8% (41/52 passes completed)
    – Total Distance: 616 yards
    – Progressive Passes: 4
    – **Passing Types:**
    – Live Passes: 44
    – Accuracy: 81.8% live passes completed
    – Crosses: 8 attempts, none completed
    – **Challenges:**
    – Tackles: 3 successful out of 3 attempts (100%)
    – Challenges Won: 100%
    – Take-Ons: None
    – **Carries:**
    – Total Distance: 37 yards
    – Progressive Distance: 7 yards
    – 0 Progressive Carries
    – **Receiving:**
    – Passes Received: 37
    – Progressive Passes Received: 1
    – **Summary:**
    – Max Lowe showed strong defensive capabilities with perfect tackling success and reliable passing. However, his crossing accuracy was poor, and he contributed little in terms of carrying the ball forward.

    #### 13. Di’Shon Bernard (CB)
    – **Minutes Played:** 90
    – **Passing:**
    – Accuracy: 86.1% (68/79 passes completed)
    – Total Distance: 1185 yards
    – Progressive Passes: 1
    – **Passing Types:**
    – Live Passes: 70
    – Accuracy: 97.1% live passes completed
    – Crosses: 1 attempt, not completed
    – **Challenges:**
    – Tackles: 1 successful out of 1 attempt (100%)
    – Challenges Won: 100%
    – Take-Ons: None
    – **Carries:**
    – Total Distance: 200 yards
    – Progressive Distance: 116 yards
    – 1 Progressive Carry
    – **Receiving:**
    – Passes Received: 54
    – Progressive Passes Received: 1
    – **Summary:**
    – Di’Shon Bernard had a solid performance in defense, with high pass accuracy and significant ball progression. His ability to carry the ball forward contributed to his strong overall performance.

    #### 14. Michael Ihiekwe (CB)
    – **Minutes Played:** 90
    – **Passing:**
    – Accuracy: 80.6% (54/67 passes completed)
    – Total Distance: 1104 yards
    – Progressive Passes: 2
    – **Passing Types:**
    – Live Passes: 65
    – Accuracy: 84.6% live passes completed
    – Crosses: None
    – **Challenges:**
    – Tackles: None
    – Challenges Won: N/A
    – Take-Ons: None
    – **Carries:**
    – Total Distance: 135 yards
    – Progressive Distance: 60 yards
    – 1 Progressive Carry
    – **Receiving:**
    – Passes Received: 46
    – Progressive Passes Received: 0
    – **Summary:**
    – Michael Ihiekwe played a key role in defense with solid passing and ball progression. While he did not engage much in tackles or take-ons, his passing reliability was crucial to maintaining possession and building from the back.

    #### 15. Yan Valery (RB)
    – **Minutes Played:** 90
    – **Passing:**
    – Accuracy: 76.6% (36/47 passes completed)
    – Total Distance: 560 yards
    – Progressive Passes: 4
    – **Passing Types:**
    – Live Passes: 38
    – Accuracy: 81.6% live passes completed
    – Crosses: 8 attempts, none completed
    – **Challenges:**
    – Tackles: 5 successful out of 5 attempts (100%)
    – Challenges Won: 100%
    – Take-Ons: 3 attempts, 2 successful (66.7%)
    – **Carries:**
    – Total Distance: 131 yards
    – Progressive Distance: 77 yards
    – 2 Progressive Carries
    – **Receiving:**
    – Passes Received: 32
    – Progressive Passes Received: 3
    – **Summary:**
    – Yan Valery had a strong all-around performance, excelling in defensive challenges, take-ons, and ball progression. Despite his crossing inefficiencies, he contributed significantly to both defense and attack.

Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.