Millwall v Sheffield Wednesday stats for players
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 3, 2024 at 12:12 pm #20102Derek DuckworthKeymasterPublic
Player Rating from AI analysis
James Beadle (GK) – 4/10
Yan Valery (RB) – 5/10
Di’Shon Bernard (CB) – 5/10
Michael Ihiekwe (CB) – 4/10
Max Lowe (LB) – 4/10
Shea Charles (DM) – 5/10
Barry Bannan (DM) – 6/10
Josh Windass (AM) – 4/10
Jamal Lowe (AM) – 5/10
Anthony Musaba (LW/RW) – 4/10
Djeidi Gassama (RW) – 3/10
Olaf Kobacki (LW) – 3/10
Ike Ugbo (FW) – 3/10
Michael Smith (FW) – 2/10
Pol Valentín (RW) – 3/10
Svante Ingelsson (DM) – 3/10—
### Detailed Player Analysis
#### 1. Ike Ugbo (FW)
– **Minutes Played:** 61
– **Passing:**
– Accuracy: 66.7% (4/6 passes completed)
– Total Distance: 53 yards
– Progressive Passes: 1
– **Passing Types:**
– Live Passes: 6
– Accuracy: 66.7% live passes completed
– **Challenges:**
– Tackles: 1 successful tackle
– Challenges Won: 100%
– Take-Ons: 2 attempts, none successful
– **Carries:**
– Total Distance: 31 yards
– Progressive Distance: 10 yards
– 1 Progressive Carry
– **Receiving:**
– Passes Received: 8
– Progressive Passes Received: 2
– **Summary:**
– Ike Ugbo had limited involvement with only 61 minutes on the field. His passing was relatively accurate, and he managed a few progressive movements with the ball. However, he struggled with take-ons and was mostly ineffective in attack.—
#### 2. Michael Smith (FW)
– **Minutes Played:** 29
– **Passing:**
– Accuracy: 50% (4/8 passes completed)
– Total Distance: 46 yards
– Progressive Passes: 0
– **Passing Types:**
– Live Passes: 8
– Accuracy: 50% live passes completed
– **Challenges:**
– Tackles: None
– Challenges Won: 0%
– Take-Ons: No attempts
– **Carries:**
– Total Distance: 25 yards
– No Progressive Carries
– **Receiving:**
– Passes Received: 9
– Progressive Passes Received: 4
– **Summary:**
– Michael Smith had minimal impact in his short time on the field. His passing was below average, and he did not contribute much in terms of progression or challenges.—
#### 3. Anthony Musaba (LW/RW)
– **Minutes Played:** 82
– **Passing:**
– Accuracy: 66.7% (14/21 passes completed)
– Total Distance: 206 yards
– Progressive Passes: 3
– **Passing Types:**
– Live Passes: 21
– Accuracy: 66.7% live passes completed
– Crosses: 1 attempt, not completed
– **Challenges:**
– Tackles: None
– Challenges Won: 0%
– Take-Ons: 8 attempts, 2 successful (25%)
– **Carries:**
– Total Distance: 151 yards
– Progressive Distance: 56 yards
– 3 Progressive Carries
– **Receiving:**
– Passes Received: 22
– Progressive Passes Received: 5
– **Summary:**
– Anthony Musaba was active in both passing and carrying the ball forward. He made significant progress with the ball, although his take-on success rate was low. He was involved in progressive play but lacked efficiency in converting crosses.—
#### 4. Pol Valentín (RW)
– **Minutes Played:** 8
– **Passing:**
– Accuracy: 75% (3/4 passes completed)
– Total Distance: 55 yards
– Progressive Passes: 2
– **Passing Types:**
– Live Passes: 2
– Accuracy: 50% live passes completed
– **Challenges:**
– Tackles: None
– Challenges Won: N/A
– Take-Ons: No attempts
– **Carries:**
– Total Distance: 13 yards
– Progressive Distance: 11 yards
– **Receiving:**
– Passes Received: 5
– Progressive Passes Received: 3
– **Summary:**
– Despite his brief appearance, Pol Valentín showed accuracy in his passing and contributed a couple of progressive passes. His involvement was minimal due to the limited time on the field.—
#### 5. Djeidi Gassama (RW)
– **Minutes Played:** 61
– **Passing:**
– Accuracy: 72.7% (8/11 passes completed)
– Total Distance: 132 yards
– Progressive Passes: 1
– **Passing Types:**
– Live Passes: 10
– Accuracy: 90% live passes completed
– Crosses: 1 attempt, not completed
– **Challenges:**
– Tackles: None
– Challenges Won: N/A
– Take-Ons: 3 attempts, 1 successful (33.3%)
– **Carries:**
– Total Distance: 111 yards
– Progressive Distance: 41 yards
– 2 Progressive Carries
– **Receiving:**
– Passes Received: 17
– Progressive Passes Received: 3
– **Summary:**
– Djeidi Gassama was relatively efficient in passing and take-ons, contributing to the progression of the play. However, his impact was moderate, with limited effectiveness in the final third.—
#### 6. Olaf Kobacki (LW)
– **Minutes Played:** 29
– **Passing:**
– Accuracy: 57.1% (8/14 passes completed)
– Total Distance: 78 yards
– Progressive Passes: 1
– **Passing Types:**
– Live Passes: 14
– Accuracy: 57.1% live passes completed
– Crosses: 1 attempt, not completed
– **Challenges:**
– Tackles: 1 attempt, unsuccessful
– Challenges Won: N/A
– Take-Ons: 1 attempt, successful
– **Carries:**
– Total Distance: 41 yards
– Progressive Distance: 12 yards
– **Receiving:**
– Passes Received: 13
– Progressive Passes Received: 4
– **Summary:**
– Olaf Kobacki had a brief impact, showing some progression in passing and carrying but lacked accuracy in passing and challenges.—
#### 7. Jamal Lowe (AM)
– **Minutes Played:** 61
– **Passing:**
– Accuracy: 82.4% (14/17 passes completed)
– Total Distance: 130 yards
– Progressive Passes: 1
– **Passing Types:**
– Live Passes: 15
– Accuracy: 90% live passes completed
– **Challenges:**
– Tackles: None
– Challenges Won: N/A
– Take-Ons: 3 attempts, 2 successful (66.7%)
– **Carries:**
– Total Distance: 67 yards
– Progressive Distance: 36 yards
– 1 Progressive Carry
– **Receiving:**
– Passes Received: 16
– Progressive Passes Received: 3
– **Summary:**
– Jamal Lowe was highly effective in passing and take-ons. He played a crucial role in progressing the ball, with a good success rate in take-ons and carrying the ball forward.—
#### 8. Josh Windass (AM)
– **Challenges:**
– Tackles: None
– Challenges Won: N/A
– Take-Ons: 1 attempt, successful
– **Carries:**
– Total Distance: 26 yards
– Progressive Distance: 15 yards
– 1 Progressive Carry
– **Receiving:**
– Passes Received: 7
– Progressive Passes Received: 2
– **Summary:**
– Josh Windass had limited time on the field but made the most of his opportunities, particularly in passing and take-ons. His 100% completion rate for live passes highlights his precision, although he was less effective with crosses.—
#### 9. Shea Charles (DM)
– **Minutes Played:** 82
– **Passing:**
– Accuracy: 77.3% (34/44 passes completed)
– Total Distance: 472 yards
– Progressive Passes: 6
– **Passing Types:**
– Live Passes: 44
– Accuracy: 77.3% live passes completed
– Crosses: 1 attempt, not completed
– **Challenges:**
– Tackles: 5 successful out of 6 attempts (83.3%)
– Challenges Won: 66.7%
– Take-Ons: 1 attempt, unsuccessful
– **Carries:**
– Total Distance: 66 yards
– Progressive Distance: 36 yards
– 1 Progressive Carry
– **Receiving:**
– Passes Received: 29
– Progressive Passes Received: 1
– **Summary:**
– Shea Charles had a solid performance, especially in tackling and progressive passing. He was a key player in the defensive midfield, contributing both in defense and transitioning the ball forward.—
#### 10. Svante Ingelsson (DM)
– **Minutes Played:** 8
– **Passing:**
– Accuracy: 63.6% (7/11 passes completed)
– Total Distance: 137 yards
– Progressive Passes: 0
– **Passing Types:**
– Live Passes: 8
– Accuracy: 100% live passes completed
– Crosses: 1 attempt, not completed
– **Challenges:**
– Tackles: None
– Challenges Won: N/A
– Take-Ons: None
– **Carries:**
– Total Distance: 6 yards
– No Progressive Carries
– **Receiving:**
– Passes Received: 6
– Progressive Passes Received: 1
– **Summary:**
– With limited time on the field, Svante Ingelsson had minimal impact. His passing was somewhat inaccurate, and he did not contribute much in terms of challenges or progression.—
#### 11. Barry Bannan (DM)
– **Minutes Played:** 90
– **Passing:**
– Accuracy: 79.7% (55/69 passes completed)
– Total Distance: 873 yards
– Progressive Passes: 8
– **Passing Types:**
– Live Passes: 60
– Accuracy: 91.7% live passes completed
– Crosses: 4 attempts, 2 completed
– **Challenges:**
– Tackles: 2 successful out of 3 attempts (66.7%)
– Challenges Won: 50%
– Take-Ons: None
– **Carries:**
– Total Distance: 104 yards
– Progressive Distance: 40 yards
– 0 Progressive Carries
– **Receiving:**
– Passes Received: 53
– Progressive Passes Received: 1
– **Summary:**
– Barry Bannan had a significant influence in midfield, particularly with his accurate passing and ability to progress the ball. He was effective in both distribution and defensive challenges, contributing consistently over 90 minutes.—
#### 12. Max Lowe (LB)
– **Minutes Played:** 90
– **Passing:**
– Accuracy: 78.8% (41/52 passes completed)
– Total Distance: 616 yards
– Progressive Passes: 4
– **Passing Types:**
– Live Passes: 44
– Accuracy: 81.8% live passes completed
– Crosses: 8 attempts, none completed
– **Challenges:**
– Tackles: 3 successful out of 3 attempts (100%)
– Challenges Won: 100%
– Take-Ons: None
– **Carries:**
– Total Distance: 37 yards
– Progressive Distance: 7 yards
– 0 Progressive Carries
– **Receiving:**
– Passes Received: 37
– Progressive Passes Received: 1
– **Summary:**
– Max Lowe showed strong defensive capabilities with perfect tackling success and reliable passing. However, his crossing accuracy was poor, and he contributed little in terms of carrying the ball forward.—
#### 13. Di’Shon Bernard (CB)
– **Minutes Played:** 90
– **Passing:**
– Accuracy: 86.1% (68/79 passes completed)
– Total Distance: 1185 yards
– Progressive Passes: 1
– **Passing Types:**
– Live Passes: 70
– Accuracy: 97.1% live passes completed
– Crosses: 1 attempt, not completed
– **Challenges:**
– Tackles: 1 successful out of 1 attempt (100%)
– Challenges Won: 100%
– Take-Ons: None
– **Carries:**
– Total Distance: 200 yards
– Progressive Distance: 116 yards
– 1 Progressive Carry
– **Receiving:**
– Passes Received: 54
– Progressive Passes Received: 1
– **Summary:**
– Di’Shon Bernard had a solid performance in defense, with high pass accuracy and significant ball progression. His ability to carry the ball forward contributed to his strong overall performance.—
#### 14. Michael Ihiekwe (CB)
– **Minutes Played:** 90
– **Passing:**
– Accuracy: 80.6% (54/67 passes completed)
– Total Distance: 1104 yards
– Progressive Passes: 2
– **Passing Types:**
– Live Passes: 65
– Accuracy: 84.6% live passes completed
– Crosses: None
– **Challenges:**
– Tackles: None
– Challenges Won: N/A
– Take-Ons: None
– **Carries:**
– Total Distance: 135 yards
– Progressive Distance: 60 yards
– 1 Progressive Carry
– **Receiving:**
– Passes Received: 46
– Progressive Passes Received: 0
– **Summary:**
– Michael Ihiekwe played a key role in defense with solid passing and ball progression. While he did not engage much in tackles or take-ons, his passing reliability was crucial to maintaining possession and building from the back.—
#### 15. Yan Valery (RB)
– **Minutes Played:** 90
– **Passing:**
– Accuracy: 76.6% (36/47 passes completed)
– Total Distance: 560 yards
– Progressive Passes: 4
– **Passing Types:**
– Live Passes: 38
– Accuracy: 81.6% live passes completed
– Crosses: 8 attempts, none completed
– **Challenges:**
– Tackles: 5 successful out of 5 attempts (100%)
– Challenges Won: 100%
– Take-Ons: 3 attempts, 2 successful (66.7%)
– **Carries:**
– Total Distance: 131 yards
– Progressive Distance: 77 yards
– 2 Progressive Carries
– **Receiving:**
– Passes Received: 32
– Progressive Passes Received: 3
– **Summary:**
– Yan Valery had a strong all-around performance, excelling in defensive challenges, take-ons, and ball progression. Despite his crossing inefficiencies, he contributed significantly to both defense and attack. -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.